Skip to content
NCBNational Capability Benchmark
Navigate with โ†‘ โ†“Enter to openEsc to close

Challenge the benchmark

Choose a score and give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider it.

When you submit, the form attaches the current score and confidence for the country and capability you chose.

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

All capabilities

Agency

How able are individuals and organizations to turn an intention into action?

The country comparison, the indicators and the documented cases below show how much of this capability the current data can capture.

125 countries in the frame6 indicators in the registry4 indicators with data121 countries with a score

Compare every country on one scale

The table starts in alphabetical order. Sort by score, confidence, coverage, or trend. A score needs two observed indicators; a trend uses indicators observed at both ends.

Scores use one 0 to 100 scale for all countries. Each flag is a country, and the ring around it shows how strong the evidence behind that score is. Point at a flag to read the country, click it to open the profile.

0255075100
  • Solid ring: usable or good evidence
  • Broken ring: thin evidence, opening further as confidence falls
  • The shaded band is the middle half of the field and the line inside it is the median.
  • United Kingdom: 94.7
  • New Zealand: 91.4
  • Australia: 86.3
  • Mauritius: 85.5
  • Estonia: 83.5
  • Nicaragua: 79.9
  • Croatia: 75.9
  • Singapore: 74.9
  • United States: 73.6
  • China: 72.5
  • Moldova: 70.5
  • Armenia: 69.9
  • Norway: 69.8
  • Cรดte d'Ivoire: 69.0
  • Canada: 68.8
  • Finland: 68.6
  • Ireland: 68.5
  • South Africa: 66.6
  • Kyrgyzstan: 66.4
  • Georgia: 66.1
  • Israel: 65.9
  • Belgium: 65.8
  • Botswana: 65.3
  • Denmark: 65.3
  • Sweden: 65.3
  • Colombia: 65.2
  • Jamaica: 65.1
  • Uzbekistan: 65.0
  • North Macedonia: 64.8
  • Rwanda: 64.7
  • South Korea: 63.7
  • Vietnam: 63.5
  • Pakistan: 62.8
  • Portugal: 62.1
  • Chile: 62.0
  • Tajikistan: 61.9
  • Romania: 61.5
  • Slovenia: 61.2
  • Slovakia: 60.7
  • Latvia: 60.2
  • Serbia: 58.9
  • Kazakhstan: 58.4
  • Burkina Faso: 56.6
  • Spain: 56.3
  • Mexico: 56.3
  • Malaysia: 55.9
  • Bulgaria: 55.8
  • Poland: 55.8
  • Hungary: 55.2
  • Czechia: 55.1
  • France: 55.1
  • Peru: 55.0
  • Azerbaijan: 54.5
  • United Arab Emirates: 54.2
  • Guatemala: 53.9
  • Lithuania: 53.7
  • Cyprus: 53.1
  • Italy: 53.1
  • Angola: 52.3
  • Brazil: 52.2
  • Switzerland: 52.1
  • Panama: 52.1
  • Netherlands: 51.6
  • Lesotho: 51.5
  • Uruguay: 51.3
  • Morocco: 51.1
  • Greece: 50.9
  • Tunisia: 50.6
  • Turkey: 49.4
  • Russia: 48.4
  • Belarus: 47.8
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo: 46.4
  • Ecuador: 45.7
  • Indonesia: 45.3
  • Costa Rica: 45.0
  • Burundi: 44.7
  • Jordan: 44.7
  • Zimbabwe: 44.7
  • Mongolia: 43.8
  • Trinidad and Tobago: 43.7
  • Albania: 43.6
  • Bangladesh: 42.7
  • Kenya: 41.9
  • Austria: 41.7
  • Namibia: 41.7
  • Ukraine: 41.3
  • Argentina: 41.0
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina: 40.7
  • Madagascar: 40.6
  • Ethiopia: 40.0
  • Venezuela: 39.1
  • Ghana: 39.0
  • Guinea: 38.6
  • Zambia: 38.3
  • Dominican Republic: 38.1
  • Bolivia: 38.0
  • Nigeria: 37.8
  • Sri Lanka: 37.4
  • Myanmar: 36.8
  • India: 36.6
  • Mali: 36.2
  • Gambia: 35.6
  • Egypt: 35.4
  • Laos: 35.3
  • Nepal: 35.3
  • Paraguay: 34.9
  • Iraq: 34.2
  • Iran: 33.0
  • Germany: 32.9
  • Guinea-Bissau: 32.7
  • Thailand: 32.4
  • Papua New Guinea: 32.1
  • Lebanon: 31.6
  • Tanzania: 31.1
  • El Salvador: 30.3
  • Mozambique: 26.8
  • Republic of the Congo: 24.8
  • Honduras: 24.6
  • Japan: 23.5
  • Uganda: 21.3
  • Philippines: 18.5
Agency scores by country
Albania43.60.443 of 5no trend
Angola52.30.493 of 5no trend
Argentina41.00.443 of 5no trend
Armenia69.90.493 of 5no trend
Australia86.30.443 of 5no trend
Austria41.70.433 of 5no trend
Azerbaijan54.50.634 of 5no trend
Bangladesh42.70.634 of 5no trend
Belarus47.80.413 of 5no trend
Belgium65.80.473 of 5no trend
Bolivia38.00.433 of 5no trend
Bosnia and Herzegovina40.70.634 of 5no trend
Botswana65.30.493 of 5no trend
Brazil52.20.443 of 5no trend
Bulgaria55.80.634 of 5no trend
Burkina Faso56.60.493 of 5no trend
Burundi44.70.302 of 5no trend
Canada68.80.604 of 5no trend
Chile62.00.433 of 5no trend
China72.50.443 of 5no trend
Colombia65.20.634 of 5no trend
Costa Rica45.00.493 of 5no trend
Cรดte d'Ivoire69.00.493 of 5no trend
Croatia75.90.634 of 5no trend
Cubanot measured. No score. 0 indicators are observed here; this model needs two before it can average a dimension score.0.000 of 5. Below the coverage floor: this model needs 2 observed rows before it publishes a score.no trend
Cyprus53.10.634 of 5no trend
Czechia55.10.493 of 5no trend
Democratic Republic of the Congo46.40.493 of 5no trend
Denmark65.30.443 of 5no trend
Dominican Republic38.10.212 of 5no trend
Ecuador45.70.634 of 5no trend
Egypt35.40.413 of 5no trend
El Salvador30.30.493 of 5no trend
Estonia83.50.634 of 5no trend
Ethiopia40.00.443 of 5no trend
Finland68.60.443 of 5no trend
France55.10.443 of 5no trend
Gambia35.60.493 of 5no trend
Georgia66.10.634 of 5no trend
Germany32.90.302 of 5no trend
Ghana39.00.493 of 5no trend
Greece50.90.634 of 5no trend
Guatemala53.90.443 of 5no trend
Guinea38.60.302 of 5no trend
Guinea-Bissau32.70.302 of 5no trend
Haitinot measured. No score. One indicator is observed here; this model needs two before it can average a dimension score.0.111 of 5. Below the coverage floor: this model needs 2 observed rows before it publishes a score.no trend
Honduras24.60.302 of 5no trend
Hungary55.20.634 of 5no trend
India36.60.443 of 5no trend
Indonesia45.30.634 of 5no trend
Iran33.00.383 of 5no trend
Iraq34.20.413 of 5no trend
Ireland68.50.493 of 5no trend
Israel65.90.493 of 5no trend
Italy53.10.634 of 5no trend
Jamaica65.10.493 of 5no trend
Japan23.50.443 of 5no trend
Jordan44.70.634 of 5no trend
Kazakhstan58.40.634 of 5no trend
Kenya41.90.443 of 5no trend
Kyrgyzstan66.40.634 of 5no trend
Laos35.30.493 of 5no trend
Latvia60.20.634 of 5no trend
Lebanon31.60.262 of 5no trend
Lesotho51.50.433 of 5no trend
Lithuania53.70.443 of 5no trend
Madagascar40.60.493 of 5no trend
Malawinot measured. No score. One indicator is observed here; this model needs two before it can average a dimension score.0.111 of 5. Below the coverage floor: this model needs 2 observed rows before it publishes a score.no trend
Malaysia55.90.634 of 5no trend
Mali36.20.433 of 5no trend
Mauritius85.50.493 of 5no trend
Mexico56.30.634 of 5no trend
Moldova70.50.493 of 5no trend
Mongolia43.80.443 of 5no trend
Morocco51.10.634 of 5no trend
Mozambique26.80.242 of 5no trend
Myanmar36.80.353 of 5no trend
Namibia41.70.493 of 5no trend
Nepal35.30.433 of 5no trend
Netherlands51.60.272 of 5no trend
New Zealand91.40.634 of 5no trend
Nicaragua79.90.262 of 5no trend
Nigeria37.80.413 of 5no trend
North Macedonia64.80.634 of 5no trend
Norway69.80.443 of 5no trend
Pakistan62.80.634 of 5no trend
Panama52.10.272 of 5no trend
Papua New Guinea32.10.433 of 5no trend
Paraguay34.90.493 of 5no trend
Peru55.00.634 of 5no trend
Philippines18.50.634 of 5no trend
Poland55.80.634 of 5no trend
Portugal62.10.634 of 5no trend
Republic of the Congo24.80.493 of 5no trend
Romania61.50.493 of 5no trend
Russia48.40.302 of 5no trend
Rwanda64.70.493 of 5no trend
Serbia58.90.493 of 5no trend
Singapore74.90.634 of 5no trend
Slovakia60.70.493 of 5no trend
Slovenia61.20.634 of 5no trend
South Africa66.60.302 of 5no trend
South Korea63.70.624 of 5no trend
Spain56.30.634 of 5no trend
Sri Lanka37.40.272 of 5no trend
Sudannot measured. No score. One indicator is observed here; this model needs two before it can average a dimension score.0.111 of 5. Below the coverage floor: this model needs 2 observed rows before it publishes a score.no trend
Sweden65.30.634 of 5no trend
Switzerland52.10.413 of 5no trend
Tajikistan61.90.544 of 5no trend
Tanzania31.10.403 of 5no trend
Thailand32.40.443 of 5no trend
Trinidad and Tobago43.70.433 of 5no trend
Tunisia50.60.634 of 5no trend
Turkey49.40.634 of 5no trend
Uganda21.30.302 of 5no trend
Ukraine41.30.192 of 5no trend
United Arab Emirates54.20.242 of 5no trend
United Kingdom94.70.493 of 5no trend
United States73.60.443 of 5no trend
Uruguay51.30.634 of 5no trend
Uzbekistan65.00.634 of 5no trend
Venezuela39.10.262 of 5no trend
Vietnam63.50.634 of 5no trend
Zambia38.30.302 of 5no trend
Zimbabwe44.70.443 of 5no trend

A score from 0 to 100 is a position inside the frame that all the benchmark countries set: zero is the weakest on a dimension and 100 is the strongest. A score of 10 puts a country near the floor of that frame and does not mean 10 percent of a capability.

Agency indicators

6 indicators define this capability. Gaps and retired rows remain because they lower confidence. Rows marked condition are published beside the score and are not part of it. Click a heading to sort.

  • direct capability measuredirect capability measure Measures the thing itself.
  • capability inputcapability input Measures something that supports the capability.
  • downstream outcomedownstream outcome Measures a result that usually follows from the capability.
  • perception proxyperception proxy Records what people or experts say, not what they did.

Agency

Agency indicators
Note
Adults doing digital tasksno datasetdirect capability measure% of adultshigher is betterITU / UNESCO UIS0.40Redefined 2026-10-02 (D152). The row asked whether adults can perform standard digital tasks, which reads a skill level, the kind of stock D122 moved out of the scores with internet users. It now counts the act: a person who did the task. It is not the internet users condition beside it, which counts access. Candidate: ITU ICT skills by type (SDG 4.4.1) through the UNESCO UIS API, probed 2026-10-02. Sent a message with an attached file reaches 33 of the 53 countries then in the frame, 25 at 2018 or later, with no United States, India or China and most of Africa and Central America missing; two other task items reach 31 and 16. The items are self-reported and the task list has changed between rounds. Wireable on one task observed for half the frame or more at 2018 or later.
Business entry efficiencydirect capability measurescore 0-100higher is betterWorld Bank0.20Activation energy, measured directly: the third pillar of B-READY business entry, which replaces time to start a business (D167). The World Bank publishes a score, not days, and the score adds the registration cost and the route for a foreign firm, so a cheap but slow registration and a fast but costly one can score alike. B-READY covered 74 of 125 countries in the 2025 round, and the countries it has not reached have no value.
Credit to the private sectorconditioncapability input% of GDPhigher is betterWorld Bank0.55A condition, not scored: financial depth is a stock of money available to actors, not what they do with it (D122). High values can also signal a credit bubble, so more is not always better.
Financial account ownershipconditioncapability input% aged 15+higher is betterWorld Bank0.50A condition, not scored: holding an account is the precondition for almost any economic action, not the action (D122). Global Findex, published every three years.
Individuals using the internetconditioncapability input% of populationhigher is betterWorld Bank0.55A condition, not scored: access to the basic tool of modern agency is what people have to act with, not a record of them acting (D122). Saturates near 95%, which compresses the top of the range.
New business densitydirect capability measureper 1,000 aged 15-64higher is betterWorld Bank0.35Directly observes intention turning into a registered entity. Undercounts informal activity, which matters for India and Brazil.
Perceived control over lifeperception proxymean 1-10higher is betterJoint EVS/WVS0.20A perception: the publisher-weighted mean, on a 1 to 10 scale, of how much freedom of choice and control respondents feel they have over the way their life turns out, from the official Joint EVS/WVS 2017-2022 results table, release 5.0.0. It observes the felt capacity to act, not action. The table prints the mean to one decimal and no top-box share, so the row stores the mean and ties are common. Fieldwork years differ by up to six years: the 37 countries emitted were surveyed between 2017 (eight, the US among them) and 2023 (India), and every value is stamped with the release year 2022. Response style on 10-point scales differs across cultures, and a closed autocracy can read high: Vietnam and Nicaragua sit near the top of the frame. Countries with separate EVS and WVS samples (Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands) are held, as for interpersonal trust. See D127 and A15.
Procedures to start a businessdirect capability measurecountlower is betterWorld Bank0.15Counts bureaucratic steps rather than money, so it does not smuggle income back in. Frozen at 2019 with Doing Business. B-READY counts no procedures, and its rule-quality pillar scores which good practices a law adopts, so no successor row replaces this one (D167). It counts until the 15-year limit sets it aside (D159).
Time to start a businessretireddirect capability measuredayslower is betterWorld Bank0.20Retired 2026-10-17 (D167). Doing Business stopped in 2019 and the World Bank archived the code. Its successor, B-READY, publishes the time and cost to register a firm as a score, and business entry efficiency carries that construct. See D23.

What countries have to work with here

Conditions record what a country has, such as infrastructure, access, money, people or enrolment. They are not part of this score, its confidence or its trend. Country pages show each value with its rank.

  • Individuals using the internetWorld Bank (IT.NET.USER.ZS), 125 of 125 countries, latest 2025

    Share of the population that used the internet in the last three months.

    Across countries it goes with income at r = 0.89 (n 123) and with this capability's score at r = 0.44 (n 121).

    A condition, not scored: access to the basic tool of modern agency is what people have to act with, not a record of them acting (D122). Saturates near 95%, which compresses the top of the range.

  • Financial account ownershipWorld Bank (FX.OWN.TOTL.ZS), 122 of 125 countries, latest 2024

    Adults with an account at a bank or mobile money provider.

    Across countries it goes with income at r = 0.78 (n 121) and with this capability's score at r = 0.37 (n 119).

    A condition, not scored: holding an account is the precondition for almost any economic action, not the action (D122). Global Findex, published every three years.

  • Credit to the private sectorWorld Bank (FS.AST.PRVT.GD.ZS), 124 of 125 countries, latest 2025

    Domestic credit provided to the private sector by financial corporations.

    Across countries it goes with income at r = 0.58 (n 123) and with this capability's score at r = 0.34 (n 121).

    A condition, not scored: financial depth is a stock of money available to actors, not what they do with it (D122). High values can also signal a credit bubble, so more is not always better.

Documented examples

These records describe something a country has done that this capability should capture. They stay outside the score because one case is not a comparable series.

Evidence for missing indicators

Each record describes a case the indicators above cannot see. It does not affect the score or confidence because one case is not comparable across countries. A gap can become an indicator when a comparable series covers at least two countries.

  • Singaporelinked to Adults doing digital tasksstarted 2016still operating

    Singapore's national ICT-skills measurement and baseline

    Singapore's Department of Statistics ICT-skills table reports 99.0% in the total row for residents aged 16โ€“74 in 2025, while 55.2% could use a basic arithmetic formula in a spreadsheet; the government uses the series to track SDG 4.4.1 and its Digital Skills for Life framework.

    99 % of residents aged 16-74, residents with an ict skill in the total row, 2025. 55.2 % of residents aged 16-74, basic spreadsheet arithmetic skill, 2025. Singapore Department of Statistics, annual ICT-skills dataset (IMDA source), retrieved 2026-08-31.

    How it worked: Singapore pairs a recurring skills measurement with a public baseline framework, Digital Skills for Life, and targeted support such as Seniors Go Digital. The combination makes digital capability a population service obligation rather than a one-off computer course, while the task rows reveal where basic access still masks deeper gaps.

    Limits: The table records task-specific self-reported or survey-derived skills for Singapore residents, not independently tested proficiency, workplace transfer or equal access. The age base changed from residents aged 15 and above in 2016โ€“2020 to ages 16โ€“74 from 2021, and a high total can hide weak performance on harder tasks such as spreadsheet work.

  • Portugallinked to Adults doing digital tasksstarted 2007dismantled

    e.escola, a national laptop-and-broadband push

    The European Commission's eSchool case study records more than 1.3 million people requesting laptops and broadband through Portugal's e.escola programme and more than one million laptops delivered in its first two years; the Portuguese government suspended the programme in 2011.

    1,300,000 people, people requesting laptops and broadband (more than), 2007-2009. 1,000,000 laptops, laptops delivered in the first two years (more than), 2007-2009. European Commission Interoperable Europe, eSchool Programme (Portugal case), retrieved 2026-08-31.

    How it worked: The state used a dedicated fund and mobile-operator partnership to put subsidised laptops and broadband into the hands of students, teachers and adult trainees, using schools and private partners for decentralised delivery.

    Limits: Device distribution measures access, not sustained use, adult or student digital competence, learning outcomes or affordability after the subsidy. The scale figures come from the programme case study, while the suspension is recorded in a Portuguese government archive; the partnership and outstanding state payments also complicate any simple claim of a completed success.

  • Indialinked to Adults doing digital tasksstarted 2017delivered and closed

    Pradhan Mantri Gramin Digital Saksharta Abhiyan

    India's PMGDISHA rural digital-literacy scheme enrolled 73,571,965 people, trained 63,941,718 and certified 47,836,188 by July 2024 through 20 hours of instruction in five digital-task modules.

    63,941,718 people, candidates trained under pmgdisha, 2024-07-26. 47,836,188 people, candidates certified under pmgdisha, 2024-07-26. Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, retrieved 2026-09-02.

    How it worked: MeitY used village-level centres, a standard five-module curriculum and external certifying agencies to move a digital-literacy offer through rural India at household scale, with certificates uploaded to DigiLocker.

    Limits: The government reports administrative training and third-party certification totals, not independently tested digital competence or continued use of services. The scheme covered rural areas and one person per targeted household, so it is not a population-wide adult-skills rate; the source also does not report completion quality, attrition or post-training use.

  • Mexicolinked to Adults doing digital tasksstarted 2015delivered and closed

    Puntos Mรฉxico Conectado, national digital learning centres

    Mexico's communications ministry operated Puntos Mรฉxico Conectado centres in all 32 states, reporting more than 410,000 enrolled members and over 260,000 course enrolments by June 2017.

    410,000 members, punto mรฉxico conectado enrolled members, 2017-06. 260,000 enrolments, course enrolments reported by the network, 2017-06. Secretarรญa de Infraestructura, Comunicaciones y Transportes, Government of Mexico, retrieved 2026-09-02.

    How it worked: The communications ministry put free digital classrooms in every state, then used equipment and curriculum partnerships with firms such as Samsung to turn connectivity points into places where people could practise new tools.

    Limits: The ministry reports registrations and course enrolments, not a comparable adult-skills test, completion rate or retained ability. The article is a programme announcement about a partnership and does not establish how many of the 410,000 members completed training or whether the network continued at that scale after 2017.

Read how the benchmark turns an indicator into a score on the method page. The limits page records where this capability is still poorly observed.