Skip to content
NCBNational
Capability
Benchmark

All capabilities

One of nine capability dimensions

Coordination

How effectively can independent actors organize around shared objectives?

This page puts the country comparison, indicator registry and documented cases together. It shows how much of the capability the current data can see.

52 countries in the frame8 indicators in the registry2 indicators with data44 countries with a score

<iframe src="https://ncb-envisioning.vercel.app/embed/compare/BRA/coordination" title="Coordination country comparison" loading="lazy" width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin"></iframe>

All countries use the same frame

The table opens alphabetically. Sort by score, confidence, coverage or trend. Scores need two observed indicators; trends use indicators observed at both ends.

Scores use one 0 to 100 scale for all countries. Each dot is a country. The box covers the middle half of the field, and the line is the median. Hollow dots have thin evidence.

0255075100Nigeria: 11.5, very thin evidenceNicaragua: 34.7, very thin evidenceGuatemala: 47.1, very thin evidenceParaguay: 51.4, very thin evidenceColombia: 52.7, very thin evidenceArgentina: 58.1, very thin evidenceDominican Republic: 62.8, very thin evidenceJapan: 63.0, very thin evidenceBolivia: 63.8, very thin evidenceHaiti: 65.2, very thin evidenceHonduras: 67.7, very thin evidenceUruguay: 68.6, very thin evidenceSouth Africa: 68.9, very thin evidenceEcuador: 70.5, very thin evidenceRwanda: 74.4, very thin evidencePeru: 75.1, very thin evidenceFinland: 75.7, very thin evidencePanama: 77.6, very thin evidenceKenya: 78.1, very thin evidenceTurkey: 79.3, very thin evidencePhilippines: 79.5, very thin evidenceVietnam: 81.2, very thin evidenceChile: 81.4, very thin evidenceIndonesia: 82.3, very thin evidenceIndia: 82.9, very thin evidenceThailand: 83.9, very thin evidenceEthiopia: 84.2, very thin evidenceBrazil: 84.4, very thin evidenceGermany: 84.5, very thin evidenceIreland: 84.6, very thin evidenceMexico: 84.9, very thin evidenceEl Salvador: 86.7, very thin evidenceMalaysia: 88.0, very thin evidenceCosta Rica: 88.6, very thin evidenceAustralia: 88.7, very thin evidenceSpain: 90.0, very thin evidenceSingapore: 90.4, very thin evidenceSouth Korea: 90.6, very thin evidenceChina: 91.5, very thin evidenceEstonia: 94.6, very thin evidencePoland: 95.5, very thin evidenceFrance: 95.9, very thin evidenceNetherlands: 98.0, very thin evidenceSwitzerland: 98.3, very thin evidence
Coordination scores by country
Argentina58.1

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Argentina (ARG)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
58.1
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
Australia88.7

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Australia (AUS)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
88.7
Confidence
0.18

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.182 of 8no trend
Bolivia63.8

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Bolivia (BOL)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
63.8
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
Brazil84.4

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Brazil (BRA)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
84.4
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
Canadanot measured0.071 of 8no trend
Chile81.4

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Chile (CHL)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
81.4
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
China91.5

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
China (CHN)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
91.5
Confidence
0.19

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.192 of 8no trend
Colombia52.7

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Colombia (COL)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
52.7
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
Costa Rica88.6

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Costa Rica (CRI)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
88.6
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
Cubanot measured0.000 of 8no trend
Dominican Republic62.8

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Dominican Republic (DOM)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
62.8
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
Ecuador70.5

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Ecuador (ECU)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
70.5
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
El Salvador86.7

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
El Salvador (SLV)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
86.7
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
Estonia94.6

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Estonia (EST)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
94.6
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
Ethiopia84.2

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Ethiopia (ETH)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
84.2
Confidence
0.19

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.192 of 8no trend
Finland75.7

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Finland (FIN)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
75.7
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
France95.9

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
France (FRA)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
95.9
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
Germany84.5

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Germany (DEU)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
84.5
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
Guatemala47.1

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Guatemala (GTM)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
47.1
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
Haiti65.2

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Haiti (HTI)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
65.2
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
Honduras67.7

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Honduras (HND)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
67.7
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
India82.9

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
India (IND)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
82.9
Confidence
0.19

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.192 of 8no trend
Indonesia82.3

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Indonesia (IDN)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
82.3
Confidence
0.19

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.192 of 8no trend
Ireland84.6

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Ireland (IRL)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
84.6
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
Israelnot measured0.071 of 8no trend
Japan63.0

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Japan (JPN)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
63.0
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
Kenya78.1

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Kenya (KEN)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
78.1
Confidence
0.19

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.192 of 8no trend
Malaysia88.0

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Malaysia (MYS)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
88.0
Confidence
0.19

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.192 of 8no trend
Mexico84.9

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Mexico (MEX)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
84.9
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
Netherlands98.0

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Netherlands (NLD)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
98.0
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
Nicaragua34.7

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Nicaragua (NIC)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
34.7
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
Nigeria11.5

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Nigeria (NGA)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
11.5
Confidence
0.19

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.192 of 8no trend
Panama77.6

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Panama (PAN)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
77.6
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
Paraguay51.4

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Paraguay (PRY)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
51.4
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
Peru75.1

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Peru (PER)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
75.1
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
Philippines79.5

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Philippines (PHL)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
79.5
Confidence
0.13

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.132 of 8no trend
Poland95.5

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Poland (POL)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
95.5
Confidence
0.19

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.192 of 8no trend
Rwanda74.4

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Rwanda (RWA)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
74.4
Confidence
0.19

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.192 of 8no trend
Singapore90.4

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Singapore (SGP)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
90.4
Confidence
0.18

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.182 of 8no trend
South Africa68.9

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
South Africa (ZAF)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
68.9
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
South Korea90.6

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
South Korea (KOR)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
90.6
Confidence
0.18

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.182 of 8no trend
Spain90.0

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Spain (ESP)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
90.0
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
Swedennot measured0.071 of 8no trend
Switzerland98.3

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Switzerland (CHE)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
98.3
Confidence
0.14

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.142 of 8no trend
Thailand83.9

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Thailand (THA)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
83.9
Confidence
0.19

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.192 of 8no trend
Turkey79.3

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Turkey (TUR)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
79.3
Confidence
0.17

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.172 of 8no trend
United Arab Emiratesnot measured0.071 of 8no trend
United Kingdomnot measured0.071 of 8no trend
United Statesnot measured0.071 of 8no trend
Uruguay68.6

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Uruguay (URY)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
68.6
Confidence
0.16

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.162 of 8no trend
Venezuelanot measured0.061 of 8no trend
Vietnam81.2

This score can be challenged

Give the benchmark a specific reason to reconsider this number.

Country
Vietnam (VNM)
Dimension
Coordination
Score
81.2
Confidence
0.18

Submissions are public and start as awaiting review. A maintainer can add a response and signature after review.

0.182 of 8no trend

0 to 100 is a position inside the frame every country builds together. Zero is the weakest on a dimension and 100 is the strongest. A score of 10 puts a country near the floor of that frame. It does not mean 10 percent of a capability.

Coordination indicators

8 indicators define this capability. Gaps and retired rows remain because they lower confidence. Click a heading to sort.

  • Cdirect capability measure Measures the thing itself.
  • Icapability input Measures something that supports the capability.
  • Odownstream outcome Measures a result that usually follows from the capability.
  • Pperception proxy Records what people or experts say, not what they did.

Coordination

Coordination indicators
Note
Border compliance time to exportChourslower is betterWorld Bank0.30Observable throughput of several agencies acting together. Frozen at 2019 with Doing Business.
Budget execution fidelityCpercentage points from approved budgetlower is betterWorld Bank0.15Observable alignment between an approved public plan and what government spent. The API covers 44 of 52 countries at 2024. Values above and below 100 both indicate deviation, so the transform measures absolute distance from the approved budget rather than rewarding overspending. See D55.
Civil society strengthno datasetCindex 0-1higher is betterV-Dem0.15V-Dem core civil society index is inspectable and would fill this. Not yet wired; it needs its own ingestion adapter.
Government effectivenessretiredPz-score -2.5 to 2.5higher is betterWorld Bank0.60Retired 2026-08-26. The WGI aggregate the opinions of experts and firms, and in this set the four WGI series correlate with each other between 0.93 and 0.98 while correlating with log GDP per capita at 0.91. That is one perception of national wealth counted in three dimensions. Cross-agency delivery records are the replacement and they are a declared gap. See D23 and A4.
Logistics performanceretiredPindex 1-5higher is betterWorld Bank0.50Retired 2026-08-26. The LPI is a survey of international freight forwarders, so it records how a country looks to global logistics firms. A small country with a small port scores low whatever its state can organise, which is artefact A9. Container throughput and border time are observable and stay. See D23.
Public-private collaborationno datasetCindex 0-100higher is betternone0.25No comparable dataset. PPP investment databases measure infrastructure finance, not collaboration capacity.
Regulatory qualityretiredPz-score -2.5 to 2.5higher is betterWorld Bank0.60Retired 2026-08-26. Same measurement as government effectiveness, filed under a different name, correlating with it above 0.93. See D23 and A4.
University-industry collaborationno datasetCindex 0-100higher is betterGlobal Innovation Index0.40GII carries it, but the underlying item is a WEF executive opinion survey whose microdata is not inspectable. Excluded on principle 4.

Documented deliveries add context to the data

These records describe a country doing something this capability should capture. They stay outside the score because one case is not a comparable series.

Evidence for missing indicators

Each record describes a case the indicators above cannot see. It does not affect the score or confidence because one case is not comparable across countries. A gap can become an indicator when a comparable series covers at least two countries.

  • The Fraunhofer contract-research modellinked to University-industry collaboration, started 1973, still operating

    Germany funds the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft's institutes in proportion to what they earn from industry, and in 2025 the society performed 3.2 billion euros of contract research, 966 million euros of it paid by industry.

    966,000,000 euros, industrial revenue, 2025. 3,200,000,000 euros, contract research volume, 2025. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, facts and figures, retrieved 2026-08-27.

    How it worked: The state pays each institute a base grant that grows with the industrial income it wins, so every institute director is structurally forced to sell applied research to firms while the public base keeps the science honest.

    Limits: The figures are the society's own. Revenue measures demand for applied research, not whether knowledge moves between universities and firms, which is what the indicator asks about, and Fraunhofer sits beside the university system rather than inside it, so a reader can argue the model routes around university-industry collaboration as much as it evidences it. Roughly two-thirds of the budget is still public money.

  • M-Pesa, and the regulator that let it runlinked to Public-private collaboration, started 2007, still operating

    Kenya's central bank let a phone company build a national payments system in 2007 and supervised it into ubiquity, and by June 2026 Kenya had 94.2 million registered mobile money accounts and 572,104 agents, in a population of about 55 million.

    94,200,000 accounts, registered mobile money accounts, 2026-06. Central Bank of Kenya, mobile payments statistics, retrieved 2026-08-27.

    How it worked: The central bank issued a letter of no objection instead of demanding a banking licence, set conditions on trust accounts holding customer float, and wrote the e-money regulations after the system worked, legalising what it had learned rather than licensing what it could imagine.

    Limits: The delivery was Safaricom's, a majority-private company, so the record bears on public-private collaboration only through what the state did: permit, then supervise, then regulate interoperability. Registered accounts overstate people, since many Kenyans hold several, and account counts say nothing about fees, which are materially higher than card rails elsewhere. A single dominant operator is also a concentration the indicator's construct does not reward.

  • Dual-track vocational traininglinked to Public-private collaboration, started 2004, still operating

    Switzerland runs most upper-secondary education through firms: of 218,259 students enrolled in vocational education and training in 2020, 90.6 percent, 197,782, were apprentices trained inside companies under federal law.

    197,782 apprentices, apprentices in dual-track training, 2020. 90.6 % of VET students, share of vet students in the dual track, 2020. Cedefop, European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, dual-track VET scheme fiche, retrieved 2026-08-27.

    How it worked: Federal law makes firms, cantons and professional associations joint owners of training: associations write the curricula for their own occupations, firms hire and pay apprentices to do real work, and the state examines and certifies, so the labour market signals what to teach.

    Limits: Enrolment counts participation in the system, not what the training is worth; the wage and employment evidence sits in separate studies. The system long predates the number: 2004 is the current federal act, not the start of apprenticeship in Switzerland, and the record cannot show how much of the outcome is the law versus a century of employer habit. Firms train because it pays them net of apprentice output, and that arithmetic, not the statute, is the load-bearing part.

  • Itaipu Binacional, the treaty-built power systemlinked to Public-private collaboration, started 1974, still operating

    Brazil and Paraguay built and operate Itaipu through a treaty-based binational entity, which reached 14,000 megawatts of installed capacity and has supplied both countries since the first unit entered operation in 1984.

    14,000 MW, installed generating capacity, 2007. Itaipu Binacional, institutional information, retrieved 2026-08-29.

    How it worked: Brazil and Paraguay converted a contested shared river into a jointly governed operating institution with its own legal personality, fixed allocation rules and a long-lived technical system.

    Limits: Installed capacity shows the scale of the physical system, not the quality of the bilateral relationship, the project's cost or the distribution of its benefits. A treaty structure can hold a joint asset together while leaving wider coordination between the countries unresolved.

Read how the benchmark turns an indicator into a score on the method page. The limits page records where this capability is still poorly observed.