Capability agenda
Generated 2026-08-28
The frame includes 52 countries. Each dimension runs from 0 to 100, with no overall ranking. Confidence sits beside each score. Read the known limits of the data before quoting one.
Open the profile: indicators, values, years and sources
| Dimension | Score | Confidence | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anticipation | 71.2 | 0.64 | +9.9 over 10 years using 5 indicators |
| Agency | 64.0 | 0.60 | +3.1 over 10 years using 4 indicators |
| Coordination | 84.5 | 0.17 | no trend |
| Trust | not scored | 0.07 | no trend |
| Learning | 56.2 | 0.54 | +7.1 over 10 years using 2 indicators |
| Experimentation | 72.5 | 0.18 | +4.9 over 10 years using 2 indicators |
| Adaptability | 85.9 | 0.47 | +5.2 over 10 years using 4 indicators |
| Building | 64.4 | 0.54 | -1.6 over 10 years using 4 indicators |
| Shared Purpose | 55.1 | 0.25 | -5.9 over 10 years using 2 indicators |
The evidence is too thin to manage these dimensions confidently.
How much cooperation is possible beyond immediate personal networks?
Uses one observed indicator.
Missing indicators: Generalised interpersonal trust, Trust in public institutions, Cooperation beyond the in-group, Court case clearance rate.
Rejected datasets: Rule of law, Control of corruption, Intentional homicide rate.
How effectively can independent actors organize around shared objectives?
Uses 2 observed indicators.
Missing indicators: University-industry collaboration, Civil society strength, Public-private collaboration.
Rejected datasets: Government effectiveness, Regulatory quality, Logistics performance.
How easily can new approaches be attempted, tested, abandoned, and improved?
Uses 2 observed indicators.
Missing indicators: Venture capital investment, Regulatory sandbox activity, University spinouts, Business share of R&D.
To what extent can people imagine themselves as participants in a common project?
Uses 2 observed indicators.
Missing indicators: Sense of national belonging, Volunteering, Political polarisation, Civic participation.
Rejected datasets: Voice and accountability.
These scores are at least 50 with usable evidence. They still need watching.
27 requested indicators have no comparable dataset. Each lowers confidence. A gap can become an indicator when a comparable series covers at least two countries.
| Dimension | Missing indicator | What it asks |
|---|---|---|
| Anticipation | Government foresight capacity | Existence, mandate and continuity of a national strategic foresight function. |
| Anticipation | Long-horizon research share | Share of gross R&D expenditure classified as basic research. |
| Agency | Adult digital skills | Share of adults who can perform standard digital tasks. |
| Agency | Perceived control over life | Self-reported freedom of choice and control over the course of one’s life. |
| Coordination | University-industry collaboration | Intensity of research collaboration between universities and firms. |
| Coordination | Civil society strength | Autonomy, density and participatory reach of civil society organisations. |
| Coordination | Public-private collaboration | Frequency and scale of joint public-private delivery of national objectives. |
| Trust | Generalised interpersonal trust | Share agreeing that most people can be trusted. |
| Trust | Trust in public institutions | Confidence in national government, courts and civil service. |
| Trust | Cooperation beyond the in-group | Reported trust in people met for the first time and in people of another nationality. |
| Trust | Court case clearance rate | Civil and commercial cases resolved in a year as a share of cases filed in the same year. |
| Learning | Adult learning participation | Share of adults in formal or non-formal education and training in the last 12 months. |
| Learning | Research citation impact | Field-normalised citation impact of national research output. |
| Experimentation | Venture capital investment | Venture capital deployed as a share of GDP. |
| Experimentation | Regulatory sandbox activity | Number and breadth of live regulatory sandboxes and controlled trial regimes. |
| Experimentation | University spinouts | Companies formed to commercialise university research, per million people. |
| Experimentation | Business share of R&D | Share of gross R&D expenditure performed by business enterprises. |
| Adaptability | Long-term unemployment share | Unemployed for 12 months or more, as a share of total unemployment. |
| Adaptability | Export diversification | Inverse concentration of the export basket by product. |
| Adaptability | Disaster preparedness and recovery | Demonstrated capacity to prepare for and recover from major shocks. |
| Adaptability | Institutional responsiveness | Speed at which rules and public programmes are changed in response to new conditions. |
| Building | Large project delivery | Cost and schedule performance of major public infrastructure projects. |
| Building | Firm scale-up rate | Share of young firms reaching significant employment or turnover thresholds. |
| Shared Purpose | Sense of national belonging | Reported pride in and identification with the national community. |
| Shared Purpose | Volunteering | Share of adults who volunteered time to an organisation in the last month. |
| Shared Purpose | Political polarisation | Degree to which political differences run along a single hostile divide. |
| Shared Purpose | Civic participation | Active membership in associations, unions, parties and community organisations. |
Documented deliveries linked to missing indicators. They do not affect scores or confidence.
Germany funds the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft's institutes in proportion to what they earn from industry, and in 2025 the society performed 3.2 billion euros of contract research, 966 million euros of it paid by industry.
Germany answered the 2008-2009 collapse in manufacturing orders by paying firms to cut hours instead of jobs, and short-time work covered 1.44 million workers at the May 2009 peak, about 5 percent of insured employment, while unemployment barely rose.
Fill a gap, file evidence or challenge an indicator at github.com/envisioning/national-capability-benchmark. The docs explain the method and decisions.